Effects of Work-Oriented vs. Social Offline Meetings on User Editing Activity

Created 2024-11-05By BeaconLabsVersion 1.0.0

Key Points

  • In the short term (1 week), work-related meetings showed a stronger positive effect than social meetings in terms of raising the likelihood of resuming editing.
  • However, this effect did not extend to the level (intensity) of editing, and in the medium term (1 month) and long term (1 year), no significant differences were observed between work-oriented and social meetings.
  • Overall, the value of social meetings for community building appears to match the effect of work meetings on long-term editor productivity.

Background

Offline meetings include those primarily for social interaction and those that are work-oriented, directly focusing on improving Wikipedia. Theoretically, work-oriented meetings could yield larger increases in contributions by enhancing users’ capacity to contribute or heightening their awareness of needs.

Analysis Method

Dataset

  • We combine a comprehensive dataset on informal offline meetings in the German-language Wikipedia community from 2001 to 2020 with large-scale online activity data.
  • The dataset includes information on 4,408 small-scale meetings and 4,013 participating users.
  • All online actions on Wikipedia are recorded, and users’ editing activities are measured from metadata dumps.
  • Meetings are classified mainly into social (77%) and work-oriented (23%).

Intervation / Explanatory Variable

  • The intervention for this outcome is the type of offline meeting (work-oriented vs. social).
  • The models include indicators for meeting type and their interaction terms.

Dependent Variable

  • Outcome variables are the volume of users’ editing activity (number of edits) and the presence/absence of editing.
  • Analyses are conducted over short (1 week), medium (1 month), and long (1 year) horizons.

Identification Strategy

  • Quasi-experimental approach: We employ a difference-in-differences (DiD) design comparing meeting participants (treatment group) with comparable non-participants selected via matching (control group).
  • Covariate matching: From a pool of non-participants, we construct a control group most similar to participants based on five features (days since registration; cumulative activity in mainspace and outside mainspace from registration to the meeting; and recent activity in mainspace and outside mainspace over the 7-day, 1-month, 2-month, and 1-year periods prior to the meeting). This aims to minimize pre-existing differences between groups.
  • Statistical models: For the binary outcome of resuming activity, we use a multilevel linear probability model (LPM); for changes in activity volume, we use multilevel negative binomial models. Control variables (prior activity level, tenure, administrator status, and meeting year) are included.

Results

  • Short term (1 week): For the likelihood that previously inactive users resume editing, work-related meetings showed a stronger positive effect than social meetings. However, they did not affect the intensity of editing itself.
  • Medium term (1 month) and long term (1 year): No significant differences were observed between work-oriented and social meetings in either resuming editing or editing intensity.
  • These results provide only limited support for Hypothesis that work-related meetings increase contributions more than social meetings. While there is a short-term difference in re-engagement, there is no clear difference in long-term contribution growth.

Results

  • Mixed
    Type of offline meeting (work-oriented vs. social)
    Increase the volume of users’ editing activity (number of edits) and the posibility of presence of editing

Methodologies

  • DID, Covariate matching